Evidence: Alphabetical
- US Air Force officials acknowledge that a treaty banning testing and deployment of destructive ASATS would serve U.S. National Security interests
- U.S. has Effectively isolated China from other Major Space-Faring Nations
- U.S. Navy can employ countermeasures to foil Chinese space surveillance
- U.S. is not planning to weaponize outer space
- U.S. remains committed to pursuing international cooperation in outer space
- U.S. has placed restrictions on space surveillance data because of security concerns
- U.S. and European Union continuing work on hypersonic flight programs
- U.S. working on solid-state laser weapon for use in anti-satellite weapon
- U.S. working on pre-cursor technology for anti-satellite weapons
- U.S. needs to improve situational awareness of all space objects
- U.S. deployment of space weapons would strain world's patience for U.S. military dominance
- U.S. Dominance of Low-Earth Orbit would Prevent an Arms Race
- U.S. should not allow another country to acquire breakthrough technology of space weapons
- U.S. Cold War experience shows limitations of trying to use military dominance to shape events
- U.S. deployment of space weapons would be viewed as purely offensive
- USAF may impose more secrecy restrictions on space surveillance data
- U.S. satellite export restrictions do more harm than good by constraining domestic research and innovation
- U.S. long-range strike capabilities impose significant costs on adversaries
- UNIDR's attempt to define a space weapon
- Unlike previous military advances, U.S. alone has the capacity to develop and deploy space weapons
- U.S. has much to gain from space weaponization
- U.S. Dominance of Low-Earth Orbit could Prevent a Space Arms Race
- U.S. pre-emptive attacks on satellites will be politically costly and ineffective because of imperfect intelligence
- U.S. weaponization of space would reverse efforts to curb proliferation
- Uncertain Security Requirements are a Structural Barrier to Military Space Programs
- U.S. Space Sector has Commanding Lead -- Almost Two Generations ahead of Other Countries
- Underlying Structural Issues Impede U.S. Military Space Policy
- U.S. Air Force Planning Documents show Intent to Weaponize Space
- U.S. research and development programs show clear interest in weaponizing outer space
- U.S. can use ground-based offensive counterspace operations
- U.S. should rely on arms control and diplomacy rather than dissuasion
- U.S. Unlikely to Meet any of the Conditions for Dissuading China from Developing Space Weapons
- U.S. Naval Dominance has Increased Submarine Proliferation Rather than Dissuading Adversaries
- U.S. military dependent on access to commercial systems
- U.S. Pursuing Tactical Satellite Capabilities
- U.S. currently unable to implement replenishment strategy