Evidence: Alphabetical
- "Naval Analogy" fails because threat to nations from space weapons is greater than threat to nations from naval ships in the 19th century
- "Naval analogy" argument is more to justify U.S. dominance of outer space than to protect innocent passage
- "Rods from God" are strategically better than conventional weapons and politically superior to nuclear weapons at striking deeply buried targets
- "Bodyguard" satellites won't reduce satellite vulnerability
- "Space dominance" claims commit the "fallacy of the last move" -- recent Chinese ASAT test confirms enemy will always have a 'vote'
- "Absentee" Problem Means Global Coverage Requires Extensive Constellations for Space-Based Missile Defense