Evidence: Alphabetical
- Historically, Economic Needs Have Motivated Nations to Go to War
- Historically, technological monopolies never last
- History shows that character and motivations of states is more important than technology for determining what is 'destabilizing'
- HAND ASAT threat deterred by U.S. nuclear arsenal
- History shows that even advanced surveillance capabilities do not give combatants a decisive advantage
- Historically, technology concerns about space programs are often overrated
- Humanity has failed at past attempts to restrict development of weaponry
- Human nature makes development of space weapons inevitable
- Historical Record Demonstrates that not all Defensive Weapons Spark an Arms Races
- History of air power shows other countries will quickly develop countermeasures to space weapons
- History of Air Power Shows Space Power Unlikely to be Decisive
- Hypothetical 'sneak-attack' on U.S. Space Assets is highly unlikely scenario
- Historically, dominance of a regime (air, sea) by a liberal hegemonic power has been beneficial for commerce and peace
- History demonstrates that deployment of space weapons or space-based missile defense unlikely to start an arms race
- Historically, dominance of sea by hegemonic power helped to maintain global order and commerce
- History of miscommunication between U.S. and China on space issues
- History shows that arguments that space weaponization is technologically infeasible are not useful to overall debate
- High-powered microwave weapons can overload and disable a satellite without kinetic damage
- High altitude nuclear detonation EMP attack does not require technical sophistication