Evidence: Alphabetical
- Funding for space weapons will come at the expense of other modernization efforts
- Force-Projection Space Weapons could Revolutionize American Military Power
- Force-projection space weapons could become a decisive force
- Force-projection space weapons are neither politically nor technologically feasible
- Foreign adversaries can utilize commercial satellite services that the U.S. will be politically unable to disable
- Force-projection space weapons would be 10 times more expensive than comparable conventional systems
- Funds for space weapons will necessarily come from budgets for existing conventional operations
- Focus on space control tradesoff with focus on fleeting targets
- France working on space surveillance radar capabilities
- Finding consensus on definition of a space weapons is not impossible if political will exists
- Focused Space Weapons Ban could be Acceptable to US because it would allow Ground-Based Missile Defense
- Future space strategy should acknowledge the increasingly cooperative post-state world of outer space affairs
- Freedom of action and international norms are not in conflict in outer space
- For purposes of arms control, KE-ASAT and BMD weapon systems are indistinguishable
- Focusing on space arms control would benefit US national security by breaking logjam on other important issues
- Foreign space companies touting ITAR free products as a reason to prefer their products over U.S. Export controlled products
- Fifty years later and international space community hasn't come up with viable plan to share space surveillance data
- Following four watershed moments in military space over the past two decades, U.S. allies are increasingly seeking to become independent in military space