Evidence: Alphabetical
- No evidence for an actual threat to U.S. space assets
- No nation currently possess an operational ASAT capability that poses a significant threat to the U.S.
- No country has used lethal or destructive force from, to, or within space
- Not clear that attacking a satellite is an act of war in the same way attacking a ship would be
- Naval analogy does not apply to space because spacecraft are more like lighthouses than ships
- New global threat environment requires U.S. to develop long-range precision strike capabilities
- New strike capabilities are needed to address challenge from HDBTs
- NATO forces struck Serbian satellite ground stations in Operation Allied Force
- Number of states emphasizing military space in their military doctrine is increasing
- Number of states with access to outer space is steadily increasing
- No Other Nation would be Able to Challenge the U.S. in Space if it Deployed Space Weapons
- No other nation has ability to compete with United States in an arms race in space
- Nuclear proliferation more likely consequence of space weaponization than an arms race in outer space
- NASA study shows risk of catastrophic collision with space debris may be higher than previously thought
- New U.S. military space policy directive is imminent
- North Korea is Interested in Launching a Satellite for Economic Reasons
- North Korea is developing a new intermediate range ballistic missile
- No Evidence that U.S. has already Developed Destructive Anti-Satellite Weapons
- New National Space Policy emphasizes international space cooperation
- New National Space Policy does not Rule out Development of Space Weapons
- North Korea is working on long-range ballistic missiles
- Nationalism is Motivating Factor Behind Iran's Space Program
- National Security Concerns are Driving Iran's Space Effort
- National and International Efforts to Mitigate Space Debris
- No need in Forseeable Future for U.S. to Deploy Space-Based ASATs
- No consensus on what tools could be used to effectively verify space arms control
- No Military Advantage to be Gained from Attacking Russian Space Assets
- National Technical Means could be used to verify an international treaty against ASAT testing, deployment, and use
- No basis for assumption that China intends to challenge U.S. military hegemony strategically
- Next to impossible to conceal satellite launches and orbits from amateurs , let alone military professionals
- No other nation currently has desire or capacity to compete with U.S. in outer space
- Number of Spacefaring Nations Predicted to Double in Next Few Years
- New national space policy emphasizes cooperative, multilateral approach to space security
- Nature of war will remain constant despite impressive advantages of space technology
- Neither the US or China have the fiscal resources to engage in a space race
- Norms established through European Code of Conduct could evolve into customary international law