Evidence: Alphabetical
- Space Arms Control Should Focus on Banning Activities Rather than Objects
- Should not put too much Faith in "Moral Revulsion" or "Mutual Deterrence" as Norms against Space Weapons
- Simple listing of China's many counterspace programs confirms their intent to counter U.S. strength better than a review of literature
- Suggestions for Establishing an International Space Surveillance Agreement
- Space Security Regime will Evolve Step-by-Step as Confidence Builds
- Should get used to era of extreme transparency with commercial satellite imagery
- Space-based missile defense uniquely capable of breaking will of rouge nations to continue fight
- Self Reliance and National Prestige Driving India and China's Space Programs
- Should Update Existing Outer Space Law to Promote Transparency about Military Space Intentions and Provide Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
- Significant international cooperation belies claims of a "new space race to the moon"
- Since space weaponization is inevitable, U.S. should lead and maintain dominance as the leader of the free world
- Space strategy increasingly demands a cooperative, multilateral approach
- Space war between U.S. and China would remain limited as both sides would fear escalation
- Should not take China's protests too seriously, they are only pursuing strategic advantage over U.S. through space arms control
- Space weaponization is inevitable given the strategic value U.S. places on its space assets
- Space weapons will not provide decisive strategic advantage
- Successful multilateral resolution of North Korean issue probably a necessary pre-requisite for space cooperation
- Scenario analysis shows that both fears of a space "Pearl Harbor" and dreams of space dominance are unlikely
- Space weapons can be stabilizing by encouraging leaders to avoid direct confrontations
- Should expect adversaries to develop countermeasures to space weapons
- Space warfare tactics apply high-technology solutions to low-technology problems
- Space weapons would not uniquely destabilize an already unbalanced outer space environment
- Space debris collisions have already damaged satellites including the HST
- Space race analogy does not apply to US and China because of relatively cooperative relationship
- States have failed to take environmental considerations into account when evaluating space arms control
- Space debris cascade could be inevitable within 10 years
- Should allow for sub-altitudinal anti satellite weapons testing for defensive purposes like USA193 and to avoid being viewed as discriminatory by new space nations
- Space has been militarized but not weaponized and and this is a rubicon we should not cross
- Since the U.S. is already a hegemonic power, U.S. domination of outer space would do more to prevent space war than cause it
- Should not assume China would be as deterred from initiating a space war as the U.S. would
- Should not accept that space warfare is inevitable but strive to prevent it
- Space warfare targeting satnav systems could create a space desert through space debris clouds, trapping humanity for generations
- Space dominance runs counter to core principles of the Outer Space Treaty
- Study showed SSA data provided by Air Force has high rate of false positives and false negatives
- Shared space situational awareness can be a valuable confidence building measure but would be best if no one state controlled it
- Should apply civil aviation analogy to space surveillance --military should only try and track threats as they relate to national security