U.S. should use space weapons as a bargaining chip
Given the lack of U.S. enthusiasm to develop space weapons, some ask why not sign a treaty to halt a space arms race before it starts? That's a legitimate question, but it's also one with a good answer. I am among those who believe that the threat of space weapons--particularly space-based missile defenses--played an important role in ending the Cold War. If the very threat of space weapons could yield such leverage against a peer competitor, what could someone offer the United States now that's worth giving up that potentially powerful position for all time?
Worden, Simon P. "High Anxiety." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Vol. 62, No. 2 (March/April 2006): 21-23. [ 2 quotes ]