Adversaries have the advantage in attacking as simple and cheap countermeasures can easily defeat costly missile defense systems.
Keywords: Missile Defense.
Can you improve on this argument text? Help develop this argument by editing and adding more information or click on one of the edit links below to add a counter, supporting, or related argument.
You can help improve this argument by adding a supporting argument.
You can help improve this argument by adding a counterargument.
You can help improve this argument by adding a related argument.
Another option would be to cover the booster with an ablative coating that would dissipate the laser energy. According to one estimate, adding a gram of heat-shield material (similar to that used on reentry vehicles) to each square centimeter of booster skin would triple the dwell time needed to effect a kill, with the extra weight of the coating having only a relatively modest impact on the missile's payload. A better option might be to coat the booster with a much lighter ablative coating such as cork. An SBL having the same specifications as those included in the RAND study's base case, firing at a booster rising above the atmosphere 3,000 km away (which would be a typical range for a 24-SBL constellation), would require about one minute to burn through a 3 centimeter-thick coating of cork—imposing on the SBL at least a several-fold increase in necessary laser dwell time. Kosiak, Steven M. Arming the Heavens: A Preliminary Assessment of the Potential Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Space-Based Weapons. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, October 31, 2007. [ 19 quotes ] [ page 25 ]