Home > Arguments > Strategic Value of Space Does not mean Space Weaponization is Inevitable

Strategic Value of Space Does not mean Space Weaponization is Inevitable (1297)

Given the difficulty involved in weaponizing space, states could rationally choose not to exploit its strategic value.

Can you improve on this argument text? Help develop this argument by editing and adding more information or click on one of the edit links below to add a counter, supporting, or related argument.
Flag this argument: [ What is this? ]

Supporting Arguments

[edit ]  [history ]
You can help improve this argument by adding a supporting argument.

Counter Arguments

[edit ]  [history ] [compare ]

Parent Arguments

Related Arguments

[edit ]  [history ]
You can help improve this argument by adding a related argument.

Evidence

Existence of vulnerabilities does not necessarily make an attack inevitable
 
There is no question that space systems are a key center of gravity (or perhaps several) for U.S. military capabilities. An enemy that attacked them might be able to impair U.S. military operations very seriously, and this ranks high among threats that concern U.S. strategists. It need not follow from this that the enemies of the United States will do so, or invest in the weapons required to do so, however. ( More ... )
Mueller, Karl P. "Is the Weaponization of Space Inevitable?." . (March 27, 2002). [ 3 quotes ] [ page 11 ]