History shows that every new environment (sea, air, underwater) eventually becomes an arena for conflict. As humanity increases its military and economic reliance on the new domain, it will become more of a source of conflict. The development of new space resources and eventual space colonization will lead to war as all previous land rushes have.
Can you improve on this argument text? Help develop this argument by editing and adding more information or click on one of the edit links below to add a counter, supporting, or related argument.
You can help improve this argument by adding a related argument.
Another line of argument in favor of space-based weapons, or at least an argument for why they are inevitable, devolves from the fact that every environment accessible to man has eventually become an arena for combat. ( More ... ) Spacy, William L. Does the United States Need Space-Based Weapons?. Maxwell AFB, AL: USAF Air University, September 1999. [ 11 quotes ] [ page 4 ]
Humanity has attempted to prevent or delay the proliferation of weapons for centuries, but history suggests that mankind is driven to develop new weapons. At the Second Lateran Council in 1139, the Church banned the crossbow for being too lethal. Within a millennium, however, humans had built nuclear weapons and used them in war. Competition is part of the human condition, and war is a natural expression of this condition. If this were not so, states would likely have forgone their military establishments and preparations for war a long time ago. We are not at the end of history -- states still vie for power in an anarchic international system and will compete in every medium of human endeavor. Former Secretary of the Air Force Sheila E. Widnall said, "We have a lot of history that tells us that warfare migrates where it can -- that nations engaged in a conflict do what they can, wherever they must." Smith, M. V. Ten Propositions Regarding Spacepower. Maxwell AFB, AL: USAF Air University, October 2002. [ 5 quotes ] [ page 81 ]
Regardless of which side of the argument is correct, the historical relationship between man and his weapons provides insight into the probable future of space-based weapons. Robert L. O'Connell suggests that human nature -- not technology -- is at the root of weapons development. Covetous motives required early man to develop new ways to kill an opponent. Today's modern weapons are more lethal than the sticks and stones of ancient days, but their purpose is still to gain an advantage over an adversary. O'Connell suggests that humans will constantly develop new weapons as long as their imagination discovers and exploits timeless and eternal scientific principles such as quantum mechanics and relativistic physics, which may give them an advantage in war. Therefore, the very idea of weaponizing space becomes a driving force to do so, like the idea of splitting and fusing the atom made doing so inevitable. "Because so much of this is a function of the physical universe and the laws that govern it, the process is, in a very real sense, beyond our control." ( More ... ) Smith, M. V. Ten Propositions Regarding Spacepower. Maxwell AFB, AL: USAF Air University, October 2002. [ 5 quotes ] [ page 81-2 ]
Formulating new and creative ideas for weapons may be inevitable, but man always has a choice whether to develop those weapons or not. Dr. Colin S. Gray cautions that the feasibility of deploying weapons in space does not mean that such weapons are strategically required -- or prudent. However, we are also warned that once someone begins development, the "technological imperative becomes nearly absolute" and that "Once the initial conditions are set, however, the logic of technology becomes nearly irresistible, at times sweeping us toward destinations never contemplated or desired." This suggests the choice to weaponize space may be beyond rational decision making. If this premise is correct, some actor may weaponize space as a poorly thought out reaction to some unforeseen security dilemma, or may already be on the slippery slope towards weaponizing space as it seeks to protect its space systems -- the two conditions that Watts believes will likely lead to the weaponization of space. The momentum is not likely to stop over the long run. Smith, M. V. Ten Propositions Regarding Spacepower. Maxwell AFB, AL: USAF Air University, October 2002. [ 5 quotes ] [ page 82 ]